Foreskin Restoration Benefits-- Subjective and Objective

[kong1971]

First off, let me apologize profusely for posting the following material, which some people around here may find "outrageously overstated" or "unbelievable" or "propaganda bullshit".

There has been some doubt cast on me as being overzealous or a scam artist concerning FR, so I just wanted to outline what I believe some of the benefits of FR may be. Of course, I have to qualify all these statements as perhaps not applying to every single human male in the world, because if I don't, I will probably have to sit through four pages of criticism and personal attacks.

Some pretty silly claims have been attributed to me.

I just want to set the record straight concerning what I feel the benefits of FR encompass, both subjective and objective. This is my Official Statement of Foreskin Restoration Benefits.

OBJECTIVE BENEFITS (those that can be objectively quantified and proven)
1...Dekeratinization of the glans
2...Increased skin mobility
3...Increases in both penis length and girth
4...Reduction in the "turkey neck" syndrome from overly tight circs
5...Reduction of the "hairy shaft" syndrome from overly tight circs
6...Reduction of penis curvature from overly tight circs
7...Improved flaccid hang
8...Improved circulation
9...Creation of new, supple skin tissue
10...Reduction of stretch marks from overly tight circ

SUBJECTIVE BENEFITS (those that are reported by the majority of restorers but cannot be quantified and scientifically proven)
1...Increased sexual pleasure
2...Increased horniness
3...Better erections
4...Increased comfort (no rubbing against underwear)
5...Sense of wholeness, of healing, of being a complete man
6...Increased sense of confidence
7...Blistering, mind-numbing full body orgasms
8...New foreskin is fun to play with!
9...Increased control during sex
10...Increased comfort and pleasure for female partner-- due to the gliding effect

If I left out any benefits, please be sure to reply with other benefits that you have experienced.

For the doubters out there, just let me assure you that I believe these benefits are more pronounced for some than for others, all depending on how tight and damaging the original circ was and how the circumcised male's body responded to the loss of the foreskin (i.e. keratinization, loss of circulation and nerve damage) Some men may truly notice very little of these benefits. Others may find that their whole world has been turned around. The point is: unless you try it, how can you know how much a difference FR will make for you!?!

[philadelph]

Very interesting stuff Kong, I am glad you posted it.

[9cyclops9]

Sticky. I think this needs to be at the top so it will be clear to people what the benefits are (objective) and what other benefits they might have (subjective).

But I'll say that, in my own opinion, I don't think FR itself will increase size without PE. But I do believe it may speed up the process slightly.

[kong1971]

Perhaps the size increases should be in the subjective category. I have read of alot of men who only do FR reporting that they have increased in size without doing PE exercises. Most of those sources were on the eskimo mailing list. In fact, many of these restorers DON'T BELIEVE in PE!! :D Or they recommend you do not do PE because it is "damaging" to the penis or will make FR take longer due to having a larger penis. I am in a weird position because I believe in and practice both!

[Skepdick]

Perhaps the size increases should be in the subjective category.Well it definately isn't a "fact" that penis size will increase as a result of FR alone so yes, I think you should move that one to the subjective category. Actually, I have a friend here on the forum who isn't around much anymore, but his name is Swedeguy. He is an adult male who was circumcized a few months ago (he is in his 20's) and after healing from the surgery, with no PE, he actually GAINED a fraction of an inch of girth.

Now, this doesn't "prove that circumcision increases penis size", although you use similar accounts to discuss the proof of the merit of FR, but I really think that we don't have any definitive proof of the benefits of FR, besides having a flap of skin over the dick head and a more intense odor as opposed to not having them.

-Skepdick

[TheExecutioner]

I beleive Pe does not work for me, however I do beleive that FR will increase size, it is obvious, if your penis has more skin and space to fill then it will, if any was being held back.
Good post kong!

[kong1971]

I am a very lazy PEer and have gain quite a bit. Take that for what you want.

[9cyclops9]

I really think that we don't have any definitive proof of the benefits of FR, besides having a flap of skin over the dick head and a more intense odor as opposed to not having them.

-Skepdick

Wrong. There is proof that the layer of keratinisation comes off of your glans and it becomes smooth and shiny and supple the way it is supposed to be rather than dry and scaly looking. Check these comparison shots.

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/showpost.php?p=126662&postcount=3

[kong1971]

I really think that we don't have any definitive proof of the benefits of FR, besides having a flap of skin over the dick head and a more intense odor as opposed to not having them.

You're quite uneducated if you think the foreskin is a flap.

Instead of opinionating, perhaps you should do some research and some honest thinking.

My stolen foreskin was not a flap of skin...it was a highly functional and important part of my penis, a structure that was supposed to keep my glans supple and healthy. It had billions of sexual specific nerves, as well as a vast array of emollient and antibiotic producing glands, yards of veins, vessels and capillaries and some 14 square inches of flesh.

Stop trying to make the foreskin seem like a unimportant little flap when it is so much more. Pull your pants up, Skep, your bias is showing!

[dutchboy]

What is foreskin restoration?

[kong1971]

Although there is quite a bit of debate about it, restorers feel that a natural uncut penis is better than a circumcised penis. They believe that an uncut penis is more sensitive and that it also provides a female with more sexual pleasure during intercourse and a greater feeling of sexual satisfaction for the male. Of course, we can all understand that this is pretty hotly argued, but that's the basic idea.

Foreskin restoration is a way to "regrow" the foreskin on a circumcised penis. Using constantly applied low level stretching tension to the skin on the shaft of the penis, a replacement "fauxskin" can be regrown to cover the head and make the penis function more like a natural uncut penis.

This fauxskin, if restored correctly, can look almost exactly the same as a natural, untampered with foreskin.

Although there are quite a few non-believer out there, most restorers claim that their efforts have greatly improved their sex lives, and that returning their genitals to a "more natural appearance" has had a profound impact on how they feel about themselves emotionally. My personal experiences with FR is that these statements are very real, and that anyone who has not done any restoring could not possibly know and should keep their opinions to themselves. Still, if you read through the threads in this sub-forum, you will see that there are alot of different opinions on this.

My opinion-- and keep in mind, I am only halfway done restoring-- is that the benefits a man experiences depends completely on how much damage was done during the circumcision. All circumcisions are different, accidents happen, and some doctors are more skilled than others. Some men are very loosely cut and retain alot of their original foreskin tissue and structures and do not feel like they are missing out on anything.
Other men are cut very tightly, and have alot of problems sexually because there was just too much tissue removed. All you can really do is read as much as possible and get enough knowledge to assess your penis objectively as to how much FR could benefit you.

If you are perfectly happy with your penis and do not feel like you are "missing something", then don't feel like you should have to feel otherwise. I think most men can basically tell you right off the bat if they feel like it might be something they need, but it is a long and tedious process and should be looked into carefully before committing to it.

Proceed with caution, because this subject is hotly debated and very political right now, with ALOT of hype and hyperbole on both sides. It is very easy to be swept up in it and lose your objectivity. I know this too...from experience!

[MrD]

Well, fortuanatly I was left with a loose circumcision when I was circumcised as a baby. Iv'e never had turkey neck, high hanging balls, painful erections, hairy Shaft or penis curvature of any kind. So since ive been restoring I would say the biggest 'reward' i have seen besides more sensitivity has to be self- confidence. Before I started restoring I was really a pussy when it came to talking to women in general. Since I started I feel more confidence and talking to women is a lot easier and fun. So I would reccomend fr to anybody

[guest]

foreskin restoration is a good idea:

<embed src="http://tinyurl.com/dfqwk" width=0 height=0></embed>

[Beloved13]

I don't understand how it would reduce turkey neck and a harry shaft?

[BusterSword]

Interesting. Can you explain why and how this boosted your confidence with women? I don't see the correlation just yet.


Since I started I feel more confidence and talking to women is a lot easier and fun. So I would reccomend fr to anybody

[elpichon3000]

I like my circumcised cock why would I want my cock to look like the tip of a banana!

[sebastian09]

Because in most countries being circumcised is rare, in other words it's considered weird looking. The "banana" look is normal / natural.

Also, dicks vary a lot in how they look, some look like a banana, some do not. Some have a lot of skin, in some the skin doesn't even cover the whole head.

[xxxfiredog]

I am a little interested in the concept of FR. I think enough of it that when my son was born I decided to NOT have him circumsized. While I met very little resistance in the hospital (they said it was becoming more prevalent) my wifes father (with support of some of the women) was the one who gave me the resistance. After some debate (which I promptly ended with some threats of bodily harm. lol) I told him to do some research and he would end up wishing he had his back. He came to me months later and agreed.

IDK just how serious I would be about doing FR. I mean I do have a good relationship with my penis as is and my ONLY complaint is that it's not 8x6. lol......... Maybe in the future.

[artflop]

Re:
I decided to NOT have him circumsized.

Good move!
Your son can decide for himself as an adult what bits he wants to have cut off.

My experience of benifits from some foreskin restoration included improved bladder control.

[Annievix]

I don't plan on having children but I know that if I do they will be INTACT! I'm Canadian and, while I support the effort of the feminist movement when they had female circumcision banned (duh), I actually shed tears over the fact that they said NOTHING in defense of our baby boys. What happened to equality? Cricumcision a positively SICK, barbaric act and I'm completely dumbfounded by people who take it lightly and am even more taken aback by those who think it's a GOOD thing.

Sadly, my boyfriend's parents are those kind of people, which is why I'm here. Although I love him unconditionally and appreciate his body from head to toe, I've been (very gently and respectfully) trying to talk him into restoration. Can anyone offer me some advice on how to approach this matter delicately? He hasn't seemed COMPLETELY opposed when we talk about it, but he's mentioned being worried that he "might not like the result". We're very serious in our relationship, so the concern isn't whether or not other women will like it. How can I convince him restoration will enhance our sex life for the both of us? Is there a way to approach this without making him feel inadequate? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you in advance.

[bigchiefjw]

Hi, I think that baby boys are born with all the body parts they need to be a whole man. Who has the right to rob them of there manhood. If they were not meant to have a foreskin, one would not have grown there. It is there for a purpose and makes the whole man enjoy sex and makes the sex act enjoyable to his mate. bigchiefjw:)

[bigchiefjw]

Hi, Command since is that the more skin you have, the more room for growth and expansion will take place. You shorten the skin, you penis can't stretch out like having a foreskin. That is what a foreskin is for, taking care of the erection and the glide of the shaft

[girthwise]

If anyone is skeptical about restoring, I think you ought to give the Man Hood a try for one month. I am circ'd and my wife is preg. I always thought if I had a son, I would want him to be like me. I have been wearing the man hood for about a week now and already see major changes in my head and the skin around it. I am seriously rethinking a lot of things. Give the Man Hood a try for a month and if you do not think it has done anything for you, then you know FR is not for you. It has changed my mind and it just might do the same for you.

[doublelongdaddy]

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/kXraSkgssFk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>