- Joined
- Nov 25, 2003
- Messages
- 2,140
A local college is having a debate with a former sex addict, and former ���� star Ron Jeremy, it is on Jan 29 and is free to the public. The artical states it "will feature a two-hour debate and Q-and-A about the merits of �����������, who it benefits and whether it's degrading to women."
Why is ���� always considered degrading to women? What about men? Look at the male ���� stars, almost all of them have big to huge dicks, where it can effect a mans self preception of his dick. And then the women of ���� get paid on average way more than the man. what profession in america can say that? Where the men get the short end of the stick. Well execpt the producers of it. A mans money shot is good for nearly nothing, while a womans ability to fake an orgasam or two is worth near gold?
I gotta go to this debate, I think it would be cool, does antbody have any questions that you would ask during the debate just in case I get a chance to ask a few?
Shit while asking questions I hope I dont get tasered bro!
Here is the link. http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2008/01/14/news/sj2tn20080112-0113edw_porn.ii1.txt
Why is ���� always considered degrading to women? What about men? Look at the male ���� stars, almost all of them have big to huge dicks, where it can effect a mans self preception of his dick. And then the women of ���� get paid on average way more than the man. what profession in america can say that? Where the men get the short end of the stick. Well execpt the producers of it. A mans money shot is good for nearly nothing, while a womans ability to fake an orgasam or two is worth near gold?
I gotta go to this debate, I think it would be cool, does antbody have any questions that you would ask during the debate just in case I get a chance to ask a few?
Shit while asking questions I hope I dont get tasered bro!
Here is the link. http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2008/01/14/news/sj2tn20080112-0113edw_porn.ii1.txt
Last edited: